Books
have long held the power to enlighten, inspire, and transform societies. Yet,
in the hands of dictators, this power turns dark. Authoritarian regimes often
exhibit a visceral urge to publish books in vast quantities, using them to
impose their ideologies on the public. These works distort historical facts,
scapegoat specific groups, promote exaggerated doctrines, and portray the
author as a heroic national figure. To maximise their reach, these books are
sold at subsidised prices, making them accessible even to the poorest citizens.
They are frequently mandatory reading materials in schools, universities, and government
institutions, with compliance enforced through coercion or social
isolation for those who resist.
Dictators
are particularly drawn to books because they provide a powerful vehicle for
spreading their doctrines and controlling the national narrative. Books have a
sense of intellectual credibility, as they are often perceived by the public as
thoughtful, deliberate works of knowledge and authority. Through mass
publication, dictators secure not only widespread dissemination of their ideas
but also a sense of legitimacy and ideological unity among their followers.
This phenomenon becomes evident when examining influential works authored and enforced by dictators throughout history.
The Little Red Book-Mao Zedong
Mao
Zedong’s The Little Red Book was once among the most widely published
books in history, with millions of copies produced during his rule over the
People’s Republic of China. This compilation of Mao’s speeches and reflections
covered topics such as the Communist Party, revolution, discipline, capitalism,
and social and economic issues deemed vital to national progress. Its
philosophies became the standard by which the Party and nation were expected to
operate, and dissenters were branded traitors.
To
amplify its influence, The Little Red Book was printed in pocket-sized
editions, encouraging citizens to carry it everywhere and treat it as a sacred
text guiding daily life. It was mandatory for students, workers, and government
officials to own, read, and even memorise its contents. At one point, it was
used for loyalty oaths, and those unable to quote it were easily identified as
dissidents. The book permeated every facet of society:schools, factories,
military, and even weddings, where it was exchanged as a symbolic gift. Such
was its vast reach that it is rumored that billion copies of the book were
published.
After the enemies with guns have been wiped out, there will still be enemies without guns; they are bound to struggle desperately against us, and we must never regard these enemies lightly. If we do nor now raise and understand the problem in this way, we shall commit the gravest mistakes—Quotation from the Little Red Book.
Mein Kampf- Hitler
Similarly,
Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf stands as another infamous example of a
dictator’s use of books for ideological control and self-glorification. Written
during his imprisonment, Mein Kampf (meaning My Struggle) outlined
Hitler’s political manifesto and was widely distributed throughout Nazi
Germany, particularly to soldiers and newlyweds. Personalised copies, customized
with names and dedications, were given to married couples as gifts.
The book
promoted divisive messages, blaming Jews and Communists for Germany’s
challenges while championing the superiority of the so-called Aryan race. Nazi
Party members were required to study and memorise its contents, which were
frequently quoted in speeches, propaganda, and school textbooks. Civil servants
faced dismissal if they failed to demonstrate familiarity with the text,
ensuring its dominance in public life.
 |
Adolf Hitler.@Wikimedia Commons |
The Short
Course- Joseph Stalin
In the
Soviet Union, Joseph Stalin used History of the Communist Party of the
Soviet Union (Bolsheviks): Short Course, commonly known as The Short
Course, to consolidate his control. Following a familiar pattern of mass
publication and enforced indoctrination, the book rewrote history to present
Stalin as Lenin’s legitimate heir while branding other revolutionaries as
traitors. Published under the pretext of clarifying the nation’s revolutionary
past, it provided a “correct” version of Soviet history, ideology, and
morality.
The Short
Course became mandatory reading in schools, the Red Army, the civil
service, and other public institutions. While it contained some accurate
historical details, it was heavily manipulated to portray Stalin as the
nation’s saviour. Stalin personally oversaw its editing and authored the
section Dialectical and Historical Materialism, cementing his image as a
political and philosophical authority.
 |
| Famous authoritarian leaders@Wikimedia Commons |
The Green Book-Gaddafi
Muammar
Gaddafi’s The Green Book offers another unique example. Exploring topics
such as political organisation, direct democracy, religion, freedom of
expression, class structures, minorities, tribes, families, and even sports and
the arts, it appeared to champion marginalised groups often ignored by other
regimes.The notion that Africans could one day unite to
conquer the world and realise the dream of a “One Africa” was a recurring theme
in Gaddafi’s rhetoric. Yet, like other authoritarian works, it became embedded in Libyan
life. Schoolchildren memorised it, civil servants studied it, and soldiers
adhered to its teachings. Despite its progressive narrative, the book was
criticised for inconsistency and hypocrisy, as Gaddafi’s actions often
contradicted its principles, particularly as his grip on power tightened.
Notably, Gaddafi drew inspiration from Mao’s The Little Red Book.
 |
| A colourized photo of Muammar Gaddafi.@Wikimedia Commons |
Conclusion
From
Mao’s The Little Red Book to Hitler’s Mein Kampf, Stalin’s The
Short Course, and Gaddafi’s The Green Book, a clear pattern emerges:
authoritarian leaders use literature as a tool of domination. Through these
books, they controlled thought, shaped identity, redefined morality, and
altered history. Blurring the line between propaganda and doctrine, they
transformed personal ideology into national truth. These rulers proved that
words, when weaponised, can be as powerful as armies in spreading tyranny.
So, the
next time you feel the urge to put your ideologies into a book, pause for a
moment. You might just be taking the first steps down the well-worn path of a
dictator. Just kidding… or maybe not.
 |
| An English edition of The Little Red Book@Wikimedia Commons |